Thank you, @keshi, for your entry in the Steemit Crypto Academy community for this week’s contest. Below is the evaluation of your post.

Criteria	Note
#steemexclusive	✅
Plagiarism Free	✅
AI Content	✅ Original (Human Text)
Bot Free	✅
Completeness	3/10
Depth of Analysis	2/10
Practical Examples	1/10
Technical Accuracy	3/10
Formatting and Clarity	4/10

Comment/Recommendation

**Question 1:** Your explanation of on-chain data metrics was a good start, but it lacked depth and actionable insights. While some metrics, such as wallet transfers and transaction costs, were mentioned, the examples were overly general and not connected to the Steem/USDT market as required. Including detailed examples and quantitative data would enhance this section significantly. **Question 2:** The explanation of sentiment indicators, including the Fear and Greed Index, was somewhat informative but did not address market trends or provide clear historical examples. Additionally, your explanation of sentiment analysis was overly theoretical, lacking practical examples of how this applies to cryptocurrency trading. Connecting these insights to real-world trading scenarios would strengthen your response. **Question 3:** The post did not address how on-chain data and sentiment indicators complement each other, as required. There was no mention of integrating these tools to form a cohesive trading strategy, which is a critical aspect of this competition. Adding examples specific to Steem/USDT and demonstrating their combined application is necessary. **Question 4:** The post lacks a trading strategy altogether, which is a significant oversight. Developing a sentiment-based trading strategy with clear entry, exit, and risk management criteria is vital for fulfilling the contest requirements. **Question 5:** The challenges and limitations of sentiment analysis were not adequately addressed. While the post briefly mentioned misleading signals, it failed to provide mitigation strategies or real-world scenarios. Expanding on this section with examples and actionable advice would improve it greatly. **Formatting and Clarity:** The post was incomplete and lacked organization. Ideas were not presented in a logical flow, and important details were missing. Improving the structure, breaking down concepts clearly, and including visuals or charts would make it more engaging and easier to understand. **Overall:** Your post demonstrates a basic understanding of the concepts but does not meet the depth and completeness expected for this competition. Addressing the missing sections, providing detailed examples, and improving the organization would significantly enhance its quality. **Total | 2.6/10**