Thank you,@shoaib004 for publishing an article in the Steemit Crypto Academy community today . We have accessed your article and we present the result of the assessment below.

Criteria	Remark
Verified user	✅
#steemexclusive	✅
Free of Plagiarism	✅
AI Article	✅ Original (Human text!)
#Club	club5050
Bot free	✅

Comment/Recommendation

- Your analysis of the evolution of STEEM's tokenomic mechanisms is informative, but it lacks personal opinions or thoughts on the impact of these changes. - Your analysis of staking trends on the STEEM blockchain is accurate, but it focuses primarily on facts rather than interpretations or opinions. - You have well explained the role of the Proof of Brain mechanism in shaping the STEEM ecosystem, but your explanation lacks personal opinions on its effectiveness or limitations. Adding your own thoughts would have added depth to your analysis. - Your identification of challenges to reward distribution on STEEM is relevant, but your analysis lacks your own opinions on how these challenges might be resolved or mitigated. - Your discussion of how deep knowledge of STEEM tokenomics can guide investors is informative, but it would have benefited from adding your own recommendations or strategies for investors.

Overall, your post offers an informative analysis of the tokenomic aspects of STEEM, but it lacks expressions of personal opinions or unique perspectives. By incorporating your own thoughts and recommendations, you could have provided a more engaging and compelling analysis for readers. ***Total***| ***7/10***