# Greetings! ❤️ ![ea.jpg](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmSDRJfrzLkBAzuFrUwgnnkGUPQMFSeW98q8AMb4zM5MTd/ea.jpg) _source

The public health establishment has issued a slew of dietary guidelines in Anglophone countries over the last seventy years, all of which have one thing in common: they all call for the consumption of natural ingredients that people have consumed for millennia – meat, dairy, and eggs – as well as specific components of these foods, most notably saturated fat. According to the latest figures, over 60% of Britons are now overweight or obese, and metabolic health in the country is at an all-time low due to dietary restrictions. The government's distrust of whole foods in their natural condition prompted our consumption of goods such as salt-reduced cheese and skim milk that was purportedly better for us. In the United Kingdom, ultra-processed foods currently account for more than half of all food consumed. While the recent abandonment of time-honored eating patterns has had disastrous consequences, those of us who have never followed government healthy diet recommendations for evolutionary reasons should not be shocked. Is it possible that Mother Nature is a sociopath? Developing food that shortens the lifetime of humans goes against her nature. And the passage of time has only served to confirm this point. Ancient foods and dietary patterns are being dismantled regularly due to contemporary, high-quality scientific studies demonstrating their nutritional value. # Dairy ![pexels-pixabay-248412.jpg](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmSu6qK4K4GQhmZMPjzrJTtNjQsdzwbJTieULzxcQ5cHSo/pexels-pixabay-248412.jpg) _source Please, someone, bring the cheese... According to research, people who consume dairy fats daily are at a lower risk of developing cardiovascular disease. *Dairy products are available in a variety of types.* According to the NHS Eatwell Guide, healthy eating habits are promoted to the general public by promoting low-fat foods such as 1 percent fat milk, reduced-fat cheese, and low-fat yogurt. However, as its critics know it, the Eat Bad Guide is also promoted through the promotion of low-fat foods. According to a postwar urban legend, saturated fat is bad for your heart, and this diet should be followed to the letter. It was reported this week that a 16-year study of 4,150 Swedes found that dairy fat may reduce, rather than increase, the risk of cardiovascular disease, which is embarrassing for government-sponsored dietetic experts. According to a meta-analysis of 29 previous studies published in 2018, dairy consumption appears to be protective against heart disease and stroke risk. According to an increasing number of studies, consuming dairy fat can help prevent type 2 diabetes from developing. This famous statement was coined in 1991 during a conference of fruit and vegetable entrepreneurs in California, and it has since become a cornerstone of official dietary guidelines. Products such as baked beans and prepared dinners, which bear the "5 a day" symbol and make dubious health claims, are now available on the market. On the other hand, this slogan is nothing more than a marketing gimmick with no actual significance. According to the results of an eight-year study conducted in 2010, which included 500,000 participants from 23 European countries, there was no evidence to support the assumption of a substantial connection, let alone causality. Even though fruits and vegetables contain essential micronutrients, their nutritional value pales in contrast compared to other foods such as dairy products, meat, fish, and eggs. Only a tiny proportion of the population in the United Kingdom consumes the required five servings of fruits and vegetables each day, and those who do tend to choose fruit over vegetable consumption. Fruit is a rich source of sugar. A small banana contains 5.7 teaspoons of sugar, comparable to the amount found in one egg. Was the "five-a-day" promotion a factor in our decision to consume more nutritious green vegetables? Even though sweet potatoes and squash are two of the most popular vegetables, both are high in sugar. Perhaps we should investigate whether or if the five-a-day dogma is to blame for our rising sugar consumption. # Salt ![pexels-monicore-2624400.jpg](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmZKsJUmstPhdjPjkRD4Tz8KgyEt8GYBaskrYq7fyXbe3f/pexels-monicore-2624400.jpg) _source It is preferable to leave a small amount of salt in your diet rather than completely removing it. Cooking using unsalted water rather than salted water while preparing pasta is recommended to minimize our consumption of sodium (salt). However, new evidence suggests that following the ultra-low sodium diet suggested may raise the chance of developing heart disease. In contrast, a moderate salt intake appears to be appropriate for the vast majority of people. According to the study's findings, except China and a few other nations, the majority of countries currently have average salt intakes that fall below the lowest danger classification. According to the study's findings, decreased salt intake (below the recommended level) did not influence the frequency of cardiovascular events or fatalities. # Meat ![pexels-becerra-govea-photo-5774154.jpg](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmdSoDoyfvtVhs9hstxbw4WD6fraNxBxE5YwqrvrJuJZBr/pexels-becerra-govea-photo-5774154.jpg) _source While processed meals such as hotdogs and deli meats should be avoided, a nice steak will not cause any harm to your health or weight. The belief that meat is a bad meal is held by sure dietitians, some of whom have direct links to animal rights activists or other forms of ideological vegetarianism. This is even though the meat has been a staple in traditional diets for millions of years. Steaks such as ribeye, ribeye, and ribeye There has never been any evidence to support the claim that red meat causes cancer, not even in animal experiments. Thanks to Alamy and The Photo Pantry for their assistance Meat is being demonized as being dangerous for your health due to cherry-picked data from substandard studies that fail to distinguish between raw meat and ultra-processed meats such as hotdogs, which include several components and have been chemically altered. In logic, there is a distinction between causality and association. The presence of some complicating variables, such as the fact that someone who habitually consumes bacon butties may also drink excessive amounts of sugar, bread laced with chemicals, be under stress, or smoke, might make the situation more complicated. Although the International Agency for Cancer Research asserted in 2015 that red meat is undoubtedly hazardous, scientific evidence has never supported this claim. A thorough risk assessment eventually proved that this was not the case. According to epidemiological research, there is no link between red meat consumption and disease. sources of carbohydrates with a lot of starch The scientific community disagrees with the government's carb-heavy diet recommendation. The government's healthy diet suggestion to base your meals on starchy carbohydrates has been proved to be wrong, and it is long past time for a shift in perspective. Purdue University's nine-year Pure research project, which involved 148,858 participants from 21 countries, was completed in February and published online. According to the study's findings, high refined grain intake was associated with mortality and severe cardiovascular disease events. When comparing individuals who consumed the most refined grains (at least 350g per day) to those who consumed the most little refined grains, researchers discovered that those who consumed the most refined grains had a 27 percent higher mortality risk and a 33 percent higher risk of serious cardiovascular events. It was determined that decreasing the usage of refined grains should be investigated on a global basis. The attitude of our government, on the other hand, remains unaltered. # Eggs ![pexels-estudio-gourmet-2959303.jpg](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmZycv4yaMMo6hvJnXEzC5mDC7Hfw44AU8u1xzHtFcW7aT/pexels-estudio-gourmet-2959303.jpg) _source Years of conflicting advice have damaged eggs, so feel free to eat as much as you want of them. Eggs are a rich source of nutrients and are recommended for everyone. Alamy and Ian Dagnall said it best when they said Do you remember when the government urged individuals to limit their egg consumption to no more than two per week? The assumption that high-cholesterol diets are harmful was the foundation for that piece of information. Following the discovery that eating cholesterol does not affect the cholesterol profile of your blood, the official recommendation was modified. It has recently been informed that there is no suggested daily limit for egg consumption. Unfortunately, decades of health misinformation propagated from the top down have produced a legacy that is difficult to shake off. People are skeptical about the nutritional benefits of eggs, even though they are one of the most nutrient-dense foods available on the market.

**Have A Blessed Day** #### I hope you will find this useful ni sese of health # Special Mention And Thanks To: ![pexels-řaj-vaishnaw-791024.jpg](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmTy89Pjafo9z4a4ooc5czjkoDyM9vRyR2w8x7W3pRzY8q/pexels-%C5%99aj-vaishnaw-791024.jpg) _source @dobartim @flysky