![7EF8D0A5-44A7-46A9-AD7E-98B9FECCDF7C.jpeg](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmUus5d79dFGhKzGDGJMzguuWBDysLg6oKwDadE754CoVj/7EF8D0A5-44A7-46A9-AD7E-98B9FECCDF7C.jpeg) **SO IT GOES** The puss network, a decentralized blockchain ecosystem, which is facilitated by the meme coin cryptocurrency known as puss coin has been able to gather attention even though it can relatively be said to be a new and starting up cryptocurrency project and it has gained this attention and adoption and influx of users through or because of its innovative approach to digital transactions and method of operation, like its association with the steemit platform and network and also constant community contests and so on that encourages and incentivize active participation however, like many blockchain platforms, the puss network faces challenges related to the high cost of processing transactions. The high cost of processing transactions for many cryptocurrency based networks and the blockchain technology can be as a result of or can be attributed to various factors, including network congestion, the complexity of transactions, and the underlying infrastructure of the blockchain network and platforms involved in the transactions whether centralized exchange or decentralized therefore while it is seen clearly that the puss network has the potential and is already offering numerous advantages, such as enhanced security and transparency, the financial implications of transaction fees high transaction fees cannot be overlooked. So for users and businesses that have chosen to operate within the network, or to facilitate their different business financial transactions with cryptocurrency and the blockchain network and more importantly with puss coin and through the puss network, understanding the disadvantages of these high processing costs is crucial for informed decision making and strategic planning. So let us examine some of these disadvantages of the high cost of processing transactions.

INCREASED OPERATIONAL COST FOR INVESTORS AND BUSINESSES

One of the most immediate impacts or negative results of high transaction fees on the puss network is that it leads to the increase of operational costs for businesses seeing as every transaction that will be conducted and facilitated with or on the blockchain technology is going to incur a fee and that fee is usually high, increasingly high and once these high fees accumulate and they do very rapidly they become even higher and this can be a very big big financial problem or cause for large expenses especially for businesses with high transaction volumes. ![3C7D7F00-E57B-45B3-82E7-5F936DB68B84.jpeg](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmRdD15EXGJ7EYfM9Qt8xMwqYQvekWdYGHaaiQJFPawgwV/3C7D7F00-E57B-45B3-82E7-5F936DB68B84.jpeg) I mean, for instance, small and medium sized enterprises that rely on frequent small transactions rather than big not so frequent ones, they may find that these fees erode their profit margins, making it less economically viable to operate exclusively within the puss ecosystem and this financial strain can lead these small businesses to seek an alternative platform with lower transaction costs, potentially reducing the overall user base and activity within the puss network, or all together just implement go back to the traditional financial methods of facilitating transactions.

IT CREATES BARRIES OF ENTRY FOR NEW USERS.

Another disadvantage that high transaction fees poses or leads to is a significant barrier to entry for new users who just heard of or just had the cryptocurrencies and blockchain network introduced to them by a friend, work mate via social media advertising they would generally be uninterested in joining the cryptocurrency network if they notice that high transaction fees it will requires and if it so happens that the puss network was the first cryptocurrency they started with as they newly joined the cryptocurrency world even if they remain they will be sure to mark the puss coin has not suitable or put it on their blacklist. For example, the process of acquiring puss tokens, setting up wallets, and paying transaction fees can be very challenging and daunting for newly introduced users of the cryptocurrency market space and this can lead to their being discouraged and a reluctance to engage with the platform this hesitation can therefore or in turn stifle the growth of the network, as the level and amount of widespread adoption is often dependent upon the ease of access and affordability of participation.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, although the puss network offers to be a very promising decentralized platform to be used for facilitating digital transactions, the fees and high cost of processing these transactions basically present several disadvantages that cannot be ignored therefore the only choice is to address the issue once and for all therefore addressing these issues is essential for ensuring the sustainable growth and widespread adoption of the puss network, allowing it to realize its full potential in the decentralized ecosystem.