Greetings @krypto.piotr without a doubt we must be updating and reviewing the economy of any project, in the case of PH it was normal and on one occasion we discussed that this reward system would not be sustainable if the SBD decreases, hence it seems appropriate to review and take measures even when we are on time.

In this sense, let's analyze your approaches:

1. Creation of the Hope token: as is well known, it seems to me a wonderful idea, which we can use to promote user participation, however, we must think very carefully about what the process of re-purchase and burn it, since it will be this system that will generate the value added to said token, its creation is not enough but the impulse that we can generate so that it is maintained and obtains the incentive value that users need.

2. System of rewards and beneficiaries: recently it raised the fact of how to supply the 15% deficit from the PH coffers if the users only put 35% as beneficiary, you who you manage the economics of the project, you will realize that you would generate more financial pressure for PH, although you would boost the work we do as writers since our rewards would be greater, at this point, as a user and writer I agree with the decrease in the % of the beneficiaries, now as an active part of the PH, it causes me noise since I would not know if under this parameter you could sustain the academic training of some users and the emergency funds that had been established.

3. Committed users, this is the main point of the theme, I agree that we all need additional income, however, our commitment to PH cannot continue to be measured by quantity of STEEM that we obtain for commenting, from my point of view through this way we are not promoting a true commitment between the users and PH.

We must look for alternatives that allow us to establish a stable economy that benefits us all equally or, failing that, in correspondence with our level of participation.

4. New curation paths: I think at some point we discussed this point and it is notable that we need to attract new investors to contribute to the project, but while this happens, we need our base users, consolidate their voting power in both channels, since this, to the extent of the increase in ours, would make us less dependent on external votes.

I consider based on the approaches of each user, choose the best positions, analyze them and make the best decisions for the future @projecthope. Beforehand I tell you that you can count on my support to continue advancing in the consolidation of this great community. Greetings