This creates the assumption that the stake is not to be used for the development of Steem.
I think it should be reformulated that a power down can only be done to support proposals that are made here financially.
*Edit reading the total proposal makes me think it's more acceptable, but I prefer that the stake also is only allowed to be sold/powered down if steem is for example 1$ minimum. This gives Justin the incentive to improve the value of the coin.